<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:24 PM, sivasubramanian muthusamy <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:6.internet@gmail.com" target="_blank">6.internet@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p>Hello,</p>
<p><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/12/09/technology/tech-giants-issue-call-for-limits-on-government-surveillance-of-users.html" target="_blank">http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/12/09/technology/tech-giants-issue-call-for-limits-on-government-surveillance-of-users.html</a></p>


<p>Find and include a few more companies from a few other countries to persuade more governments?</p></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It is not a proposal the governments are going to accept though.</div><div><br></div><div>
No surveillance except by law enforcement with a specific court order is a much more defensible position. I have no problem with intercepts by civil authorities against specific targets. I have a big problem with military authorities performing that type of activity on that scale.</div>
<div> </div></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Website: <a href="http://hallambaker.com/">http://hallambaker.com/</a><br>
</div></div>