This mailing list is no longer active and has been transitioned to Members of the I-coordination mailing list have been moved to the new mailing list. To learn more, visit

[I-coordination] New: How do we dissect Internet governance? [Was: Europe at a tipping point?]

Nigel Hickson nigel.hickson at
Tue Dec 17 20:01:42 CET 2013

Nick; great idea; we have some from OECD; Council of Europe and European
Commission. A coordinate input to Brazil would be great!

From:  Nick Ashton-Hart <nashton at>
Date:  Tuesday, December 17, 2013 6:45 PM
To:  William Drake <william.drake at>
Cc:  "I-coordination at" <i-coordination at>
Subject:  Re: [I-coordination] New: How do we dissect Internet governance?
[Was: Europe at a tipping point?]

To Bill¹s point in the first instance it would be useful to identify those
principles that exist to date and their source and scope. Perhaps 1net could
host a wiki environment or the like where those with knowledge of one or
more could get a list together?

On 17 Dec 2013, at 18:34, William Drake <william.drake at> wrote:

> Hi George
> On Dec 17, 2013, at 6:24 PM, George Sadowsky <george.sadowsky at>
> wrote:
>> Bill,
>> You say: "Do we really have nothing more important to be doing here at this
>> point than redefining the wheel as just a round thingy?  I thought this list
>> was supposed to be for coordination of multistakeholder dialogue on Sao Paulo
>> and beyond, but it seems to alternate between being a troll paradise and the
>> site of a lot of meandering debates on points that are generally being
>> addressed more systematically elsewhere.  Or am I alone in this perception?"
>> I agree that we need to address points systematically.  Can you provide a
>> list of systematic points (dare we call them issues?) that it would, in your
>> view, be useful to discuss?
> Well, why not start with the question of principles?  The initiators of the SP
> meeting have been saying from the outset they¹d like to have a sort of
> multistakeholder declaration of principles.  Presumably it¹d be helpful if
> 1net participants were to provide some input on this, and presumably we¹d like
> it to be more than just nice fluffy words.  Why not discuss the range of
> options to make this a useful exercise, and see where there¹s
> cross-stakeholder consensus and where there¹s not?  It¹s something concrete
> that needs to be done, and they want input by 1 March.
> Cheers
> Bill
> _______________________________________________
> I-coordination mailing list
> I-coordination at

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5027 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 

More information about the I-coordination mailing list