This mailing list is no longer active and has been transitioned to firstname.lastname@example.org. Members of the I-coordination mailing list have been moved to the new mailing list. To learn more, visit 1net.org.
[I-coordination] ICANN's role vis-a-vis the Internet ecosystem
avri at acm.org
Wed Dec 11 14:27:25 CET 2013
While there are many threats to ICANN's multi stakeholder legitimacy, as pointed out by people like Milton who are deeply involved in the process of improving ICANN, I think it goes too far to condemn it as illegitimate.
Some us still still find good cause for continuing enthusiasm, despite our frequent disappointments.
For example as a member of the Accountability and Transparency Review Team (draft report open for comment - called replies - until 13 Dec http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/atrt2-recommendations-21oct13-en.htm ) I have seen the beginnings of bottom-up oversight. It still remains to be seen how well it work out in the long run, but at this point I see promise for a method by which a free standing ICANN multistakeholder could be achieved. Of course a lot of work remains to be done in this crucible of pluralistic participatory governance, but it has the best chance of any entity I can find at this point in time.
If some of that can be brought into other efforts via 1net, all the better.
Nathalie Coupet <nathaliecoupet at yahoo.com> wrote:
>Good morning George,
>It can be hard to be enthusiastic about participating in ICANN's
>structure(s) when there seems to be such a deficit in legitimacy:
>Robert Mueller and Mr. Walker from the University of Zurich has well
>If we could better understand the trade-offs of such organizational
>choices (bringing to light the hidden aspects of the iceberg), it might
>reduce the frustration of all participants and future volunteers at
>ICANN and inject some new blood in the WGs.
>My .02 cents
>I-coordination mailing list
>I-coordination at nro.net
More information about the I-coordination