This mailing list is no longer active and has been transitioned to Members of the I-coordination mailing list have been moved to the new mailing list. To learn more, visit

[I-coordination] Europe at a tipping point?

Milton L Mueller mueller at
Mon Dec 9 17:41:53 CET 2013

Carlos and Jeremy, 
If one is familiar with the history of WSIS, and with the initial reaction of states in WSIS to the demands for participation by non-state actors, and with the battle over 'enhanced cooperation', it is flat wrong to dismiss the EC draft's repeated emphasis on different (and subordinate) stakeholder roles as "ethereal." It is what the whole IG debate Is fundamentally about right now. For the EC to come down firmly on the side of subordinating non-state actors to state actors in all policy making processes would be a highly significant development - one that many of us would think of as a setback to Internet freedom and autonomy as well. 

As for waiting for the full document, well, welcome to the Heisenberg principle. Because of our intervention, and because of the internal opposition to these reactionary trends in the EC, it is unlikely that the "final document" you see will be the same as the draft that was leaked.

No need to quibble about this, really, but an organization created by a national law, the majority of whose members are government ministries, and without any representation from foreigners might reasonably be called 'state-led.'

-----Original Message-----
From: i-coordination-bounces at [mailto:i-coordination-bounces at] On Behalf Of Carlos A. Afonso
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2013 6:48 AM
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond; I-coordination at
Subject: Re: [I-coordination] Europe at a tipping point?

Hi people, I would like to read the whole document. I think IGP's analysis may be overreacting and may be misleading, but it would be great to read the whole doc first.

Two quick points which are independent of the doc's content:

- is not "state-led";

- "in their respective roles" is in fact ethereal and also includes the "respective roles" of governments, whatever this means -- it is of such generic scope that one cannot conclude that the world will end just by the mention of this.


On 12/09/2013 07:12 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
> Hello all,
> whilst we're all discussing who's going to be sitting physically at 
> the table in Brazil, the world moves on and our colleagues in Europe 
> might have some (real) work to do:
> -leaked-ec-document-stirs-internet-governance-controversy/
> Kind regards,
> Olivier
> _______________________________________________
> I-coordination mailing list
> I-coordination at

I-coordination mailing list
I-coordination at

More information about the I-coordination mailing list