This mailing list is no longer active and has been transitioned to firstname.lastname@example.org. Members of the I-coordination mailing list have been moved to the new mailing list. To learn more, visit 1net.org.
[I-coordination] Nominations to /1Net Steering committee & Brazil Meeting Organising commitees
parminder at itforchange.net
Thu Dec 5 16:00:35 CET 2013
My apologies but I may not have fully understood all of your concerns
here.... If my response does not address them well please do let me know
here, or offlist.
The groups that wrote for direct liaison from civil society side to the
Brazilian organisers, (1) did not mean that they alone should be
considered as reps of civil society (no civil society group can ever
make that claim) and (2) did not foreclose other groups from engaging
directly with the organisers or for that matter engage under some larger
umbrella like 1Net.
Civil society is that part of the society which definitionally stands
out of and away from highly organised groups, whether political
(governments, political parties) or economic (corporations etc). The
premise is that 'any' highly organised group sooner or latter begins to
work for internal/ vested interests if not checked from outside, and
thus under-performs or mis-performs its required social functions. Civil
society is supposed to provide that check. The extent of checks needed
in different contexts and at different times may vary - from being just
correctional to outright transformational (revolutions, for instance).
The paradox however is that to effectively provide such checks civil
society itself has to undergo certain level of organisation.... But then
if it becomes highly organised we would be back to the first part of
this argument about highly organised group becoming self serving - and
contradict the definition of civil society.
For this reason, civil society can never become too highly organised,
and also retain its essence, that of the 'outsider'. (Even within
authoritative committees etc it has to hold the perspective of the
'outsider'.)... It has to always hang between a minimal required
organisation and the un- organised masses which it really is supposed to
be representing. Such a ever-lasting, constitutional, tension keeps
civil society in a state of constant self-examination ....
Well, your email and my response is a part of this continuing self
examination, and we are civil society only till we continually do it :)
Anyway, you got your answer - I think other civil society group can and
should also directly approach Brazilian organisers, or take hep of some
platforms if they are avaiable. It is entirely their choice. And if the
organisers get frustrated with this and tell us - why dont you organise
yourself and come to us as one front, we can give them the above long
philosophical answer :). Sir, we are civil society, we do our best, but
a certain amount of dis-organisation is constitutional to us..
On Thursday 05 December 2013 06:18 PM, Klaus Stoll wrote:
> Dear Parminder
> Greetings. Does this mean that members of those civil society groups
> that have written to the Brazilian organizers and which to have direct
> representation should not be available for nomination to the Brazil
> preparation committees? I think that would be consequent.
> The question also stands in the room if it is constructive that some
> civil society groups seem to pick and choose whats best for them
> instead of standing in solidarity with the rest something that is far
> from perfect. I do not call this a respectful position of these civil
> society groups, it seems to be more an exercise in throwing their
> weight around. Maybe it would also be consequent for these civil
> society groups to withdraw their members from all nominations.
> Are we in this together or only when it suits us?
> Is this about organizational interests or about the common good?
>> Hi Adiel
>> If I get it right, I read below as asking civil society to send names
>> of 4 people to you - as coordinator of 1net - for 2 preparation
>> committees of the 'Brazil meeting'. Is it so?
>> I am not sure, but perhaps you know that civil society groups have
>> written to the Brazilian organisers that they will like to have a
>> direct engagment with them and not through any common front, or any
>> such thing (including 1net.)
>> In the circumstances, I wonder why the below announcement... I dare
>> say that it appears to be disrespectful of civil soicety's stand that
>> was taken together by a number of civil society groups.
>> On Thursday 05 December 2013 03:31 PM, Adiel Akplogan wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> In order to bring some clarity in to this let me remind us that each stakeholder group (Business (done), Civil Society, Technical community, Academia) is requested to appoint/nominate a total of 9 people:
>>> - 2 people for the Brazil meeting's preparation committee-1: Multistakeholder High-Level Committee
>>> *** This is the committee that will set the high-level
>>> political tone and objectives of the conference.
>>> Committee members will engage on a global level with
>>> stakeholders to encourage participation in the
>>> conference and maximize its chances of success
>>> - 2 people for the Brazil meeting's preparation Committee 3: Multistakeholder Executive Committee
>>> **** This committee owns the full responsibility of
>>> organizing the event, including: defining conference
>>> purpose/agenda, managing invitations, organizing
>>> input received by March 1 into a coherent set of
>>> proposals for the conferees to address, managing
>>> conference proceedings and process, and directing all
>>> communications activities pre-during-post conference.
>>> - 5 people to constitute the /1Net Steering committee
>>> Let me suggest December 15 as deadline to have the nominations from all the groups. Once you have your list, please forward it to me directly or share with the mailing lists. Please allow me to request that we, on this list respect what each group will come up with. It is for each interested group to organise themselves to select their reps and we must respect that.
>>> - a.
>>> I-coordination mailing list
>>> I-coordination at nro.net
>> I-coordination mailing list
>> I-coordination at nro.net
> I-coordination mailing list
> I-coordination at nro.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the I-coordination