This mailing list is no longer active and has been transitioned to Members of the I-coordination mailing list have been moved to the new mailing list. To learn more, visit

[I-coordination] Nominations to /1Net Steering committee & Brazil Meeting Organising commitees

Hossam Elgamal hossam.el-gamal at
Thu Dec 5 13:16:27 CET 2013

Dear Klaus and all,

After following for a good period of time such Chain of emails expressing interest and still confusion towards 1net and related Multistakeholders approach, I wish to confirm clearly that we have not identified best bottom up approach to voice required Multistakeholdering in any steering committee or focused teams... Personally representing the main ICT industry Association in Egypt with more than 500 member companies (Vice Chair), and representing African ICT Alliance AFICTA with more than 10 countries (Board Member), voicing as well as my colleagues for African ICT Industry, and countries' strategy from NGO and BA perspective, we can see clearly that AFRICA (business, NGOs and Academia) is not properly represented.

How can this be counted for? How can we really promote multilateralism and multistakeholding in 1net representation and build a better bottom up processes that would not lead to same weaknesses and drawbacks embedded in existing mechanism and representation?!!!

I trust that all members on the mailing list are looking forward for an enhanced approach toward Internet Governance counting for all voices so to reflect better advocacy and healthier bottom up approach with more emphasis on reflecting points of view of growing economies and less developed nations Businesses, Civil Society and Academia!

Can we take this into consideration while building the coalition and its steering committee and focused teams?!

Hossam R. El-Gamal

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Klaus Stoll <kdrstoll at> wrote:

> Dear Adiel, Dear Friends
> Greetings and Thanks for this, very useful. First time something that seems to be more or less clear.
> Whilst the aim seems to be clear, I just want to put it on the record again, that the process has a huge legitimacy problem. Just because the big 5 decide that ,quite rightly!!!, "some thing needs to be done and some thing needs to be done fast" in order to defend us against unilateralism and support multi stakeholderism in IG. Nobody should be under the illusion that this is a button       up movement, because it is not. I personally support 1net, I will participate in the process, but only because I am at the same time working to implement real bottom up processes in IG with the organizations I am involved with and we need to build bridges. As I explained in another email, there are many other organizations that will strongly support and defend multi stakeholderism in IG but they are not even on 1nets radar and that have no chance to engage or be engaged as they have no idea what is going on and 1net does not know where they are and how to involve them. We wasted 2 weeks on technical issues and internal stuff, it would have been better to spend that time also to reach out. As we are in a committee frenzy at the moment, may I suggest an 1net outreach committee that does not consist of the usual cross structural blind candidates.
> Lets get the 1net coalition going, because there seems to be a need for it, but at the same time, let's be clear, this is not "IT", its just a small step in a very long way and a way that will hopefully avoid in the future top down initiatives like 1net. 
> Yours
> Klaus
> PS: During the next week I will send an email that outlines some ways that will be in place to discuss and implement some specific IG governance issues and here in particular the so called ICANN "orphan issues". Thank you everybody who reacted and supported the suggestions in my email to this list some days ago, we are busy to pick them up and make then happen as one of the pieces in the IG jigsaw. 
>   On 12/5/2013 11:01 AM, Adiel Akplogan wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> In order to bring some clarity in to this let me remind us that each stakeholder group (Business (done), Civil Society, Technical community, Academia) is requested to appoint/nominate a total of 9 people:
>> - 2 people for the Brazil meeting's preparation committee-1:  Multistakeholder High-Level Committee
>> *** This is the committee that will set the high-level 
>>     political tone and objectives of the conference.  
>>     Committee members will engage on a global level with 
>>     stakeholders to encourage participation in the 
>>     conference and maximize its chances of success
>> - 2 people for the Brazil meeting's preparation Committee 3: Multistakeholder Executive Committee
>> **** This committee owns the full responsibility of 
>>      organizing the event, including: defining conference 
>>      purpose/agenda, managing invitations, organizing 
>>      input received by March 1 into a coherent set of 
>>      proposals for the conferees to address, managing 
>>      conference proceedings and process, and directing all 
>>      communications activities pre-during-post conference.
>> - 5 people to constitute the /1Net Steering committee
>> Let me suggest December 15 as deadline to have the nominations from all the groups. Once you have your list, please forward it to me directly or share with the mailing lists. Please allow me to request that we, on this list respect what each group will come up with. It is for each interested group to organise themselves to select their reps and we must respect that. 
>> Thanks.
>> - a.
>> _______________________________________________
>> I-coordination mailing list
>> I-coordination at
> _______________________________________________
> I-coordination mailing list
> I-coordination at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the I-coordination mailing list